Friday’s decision in U.S. v. Rahimi, could have major implications for several pending gun-rights cases and legislative measures.
—
Join Fox News for access to this content
You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.
By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.
Pleaseenteravalidemailaddress.
TheSupremeCourtonFridayupheldafederallawthatbansgunsforthosesubjecttodomesticviolencerestrainingorders(DVROs)inthefirstmajortestoftheSecondAmendmentatthehighcourtthisterm.
Inan8-1opinionauthoredbyChiefJusticeRoberts,thecourt’smajoritysaid,“[W]econcludeonlythis:AnindividualfoundbyacourttoposeacrediblethreattothephysicalsafetyofanothermaybetemporarilydisarmedconsistentwiththeSecondAmendment.”JusticeClarenceThomaswasthelonedissenter.
BothliberalandconservativejusticesagreedwiththeBidenadministrationthattherewasahistoryandtraditionofkeepingfirearmsfromdange
