Home » Judge Upholds Stun Gun Ban Despite 2016 SCOTUS Ruling

Judge Upholds Stun Gun Ban Despite 2016 SCOTUS Ruling

 

—

Stun guns are less lethal devices that, well, stun attackers rather than killing them outright. They’re also kind of fun to use on your drunk friends at parties, though I will specifically tell you not to test this out for yourself.

However,likeanythingelse,badpeoplecanusethemforbadthings.Someusedstungunstoincapacitatepeoplefornefariousreasons,evenifonlyforashorttime,andsosomeplacesmovedtobanthem. Becauseweallknowthatifyoubansomething,badpeoplecan’tfindanywaytogetitatall. In2016,though,theSupremeCourtfoundthatstungunsfellundertheSecondAmendmentandcouldn’tbebanned.Atleast,that’smymemoryofthefinding.Apparently,though,ajudgerecentlyfiguredthatwasn’treallythecaseandupheldastungunban. NewYorkersmaybeabletocarryafirearmforself-defense,butthoseseekingaless-lethaloptionwillcontinuetobeoutofluckfollowinganewfederalcourtruling. OnMonday,USDistrictCourtJudgeEdgardoRamosupheldaNewYorkstatebanandaseparateNewYorkCitybanonthesaleandpossessionofstungunsandtasers.Hedeterminedthattheplaintiffshadtheburden