Home » Judge Upholds Stun Gun Ban Despite 2016 SCOTUS Ruling

Judge Upholds Stun Gun Ban Despite 2016 SCOTUS Ruling

 

Stun guns are less lethal devices that, well, stun attackers rather than killing them outright. They’re also kind of fun to use on your drunk friends at parties, though I will specifically tell you not to test this out for yourself.

However,likeanythingelse,badpeoplecanusethemforbadthings.Someusedstungunstoincapacitatepeoplefornefariousreasons,evenifonlyforashorttime,andsosomeplacesmovedtobanthem. Becauseweallknowthatifyoubansomething,badpeoplecan’tfindanywaytogetitatall. In2016,though,theSupremeCourtfoundthatstungunsfellundertheSecondAmendmentandcouldn’tbebanned.Atleast,that’smymemoryofthefinding.Apparently,though,ajudgerecentlyfiguredthatwasn’treallythecaseandupheldastungunban. NewYorkersmaybeabletocarryafirearmforself-defense,butthoseseekingaless-lethaloptionwillcontinuetobeoutofluckfollowinganewfederalcourtruling. OnMonday,USDistrictCourtJudgeEdgardoRamosupheldaNewYorkstatebanandaseparateNewYorkCitybanonthesaleandpossessionofstungunsandtasers.Hedeterminedthattheplaintiffshadtheburden